The Truth About Conflicting Numbers Between You and the Lender
You and your lender are playing two different games. And the numbers reflect each party’s risk, not necessarily who’s right or wrong. Learn how to reconcile their numbers with yours and build smarter offers.
You ran your numbers. They made sense. Then the lender came back with a different ARV, a different rehab, and sometimes an entirely different MAO.
It’s frustrating, especially when you’re confident in your comping and construction numbers.
But here’s the key:
You and your lender are playing two different games.
And the numbers reflect each party’s risk, not necessarily who’s right or wrong.
In this article, we’ll cover:
Why lenders use different underwriting formulas
How to reconcile their numbers with yours
When their numbers signal a real problem vs. just a conservative stance
How to use both sets of numbers to build smarter offers
Two Perspectives, Two Objectives
Your Objective as a Flipper:
Maximize ROI
Stay inside a safe margin
Use leverage to increase deal volume
Make calculated risks where profit potential justifies it
Your Lender’s Objective:
Minimize loan default risk
Ensure collateral (the property) protects them
Get repaid regardless of your outcome
Stay compliant with internal and external underwriting standards
Even if you’re both looking at the same deal, your incentives are not aligned.
That’s where the number gap starts.
Let’s Break Down the Key Differences
1. After Repair Value (ARV)
Your number: Based on aggressive but realistic comps, plus your improvements and finishes. You might expect top-of-market results with good marketing.
Their number: Often based on the median comp, not the highest one. Lenders typically trim down for appraisal risk and conservative resale assumptions.
Why it differs:
Lenders don’t assume you’ll get top-dollar
They may use older or broader radius comps
They’re more concerned with what they could resell it for quickly in a default
Who’s “right”? You might be. But unless you can show extremely strong comp support, the lender’s number wins, because their capital is at risk.
2. Rehab Budget
Your number: Tight, optimized, based on known contractors, value-engineered choices, and possibly even doing some work yourself.
Their number: Higher. May include GC markup, permit risk, unknown subs, and contingency padding.
Why it differs:
Lenders often use per-square-foot estimators that reflect national or regional averages
They assume retail-level pricing, not investor discounts
If you’re newer, they may assume you’ll make mistakes or face delays
Who’s “right”?
Possibly you, if you’ve done similar projects with the same team. But from a risk mitigation standpoint, the lender's conservative estimate makes sense.
3. Loan-to-Value (LTV) vs. Loan-to-Cost (LTC)
This is where the structure of your loan changes how much you can borrow.
You might say:
Purchase: $200K
Rehab: $80K
ARV: $400K
You want: 90% purchase + 100% rehab
Lender says:
Max 70% ARV = $280K total exposure
They subtract the $80K rehab → leaving $200K for purchase
If they think rehab is $100K, they drop the purchase coverage
Why it matters:
You may think they’re underestimating your capacity, but they’re protecting their downside
They lend against their appraised ARV, not yours
If your ARV is 10% higher than theirs, you’ll feel “shorted” on leverage
4. Timeline Assumptions
You assume:
Rehab: 4 months
Sell: 2 months
Total: 6 months of financing needed
Lender assumes:
Rehab: 6 months
Sell: 3+ months
Carry: 9–12 months
This affects:
Interest reserve requirements
Cost of capital
Your debt service ratio
Why?
They base projections on what typically happens, not what you hope happens
If you’re on a tight budget and their timeline estimates are longer, it will inflate perceived risk, and reduce what they’ll lend.
5. Profit Margin Expectations
You may be targeting:
15%–20% net profit
Thin buffer (but confident in your numbers)
They want:
Enough spread that they still get paid if you don’t
At least a 10% margin after liquidation discount
You have to have “skin in the game” (cash invested)
This is why some lenders won’t fund flips with under 12% projected profit, even if the flipper is fine with it.
They don’t fund your risk tolerance. They fund theirs.
How to Handle a Deal When Your Lender Disagrees
1. Don’t Argue, Ask Questions
Instead of saying, “Your ARV is too low,” try:
“Can you show me the comps you used?”
“Which rehab line items are causing the variance?”
“What assumptions are driving the timeline?”
This opens a conversation, and you may uncover valuable insights.
Sometimes, lenders use a better comp you missed.
Other times, they simply pulled data from a generic AVM or lazy appraiser.
2. Prepare a Deal Package That Bridges the Gap
Bring data that supports your version of the numbers:
Comps with photos, distance, DOM, and finishes circled
Contractor bids with an itemized labor/materials breakdown
Project timeline with a realistic buffer and an exit plan
Recent successful flips in the area (yours or others)
This shows professionalism and can help you negotiate better terms.
3. Know When to Switch Lenders
If a lender’s underwriting is too conservative for your model, that’s not a failure; it’s a mismatch.
Some lenders:
Prefer cosmetic flips only
Penalize rural or low-density areas
Won’t fund anything with foundation work
Want 20% equity minimums no matter what
If your flips consistently get lowball valuations from them, shop around.
There are aggressive hard money lenders, risk-tolerant private lenders, and even family office-backed capital for experienced flippers.
Who’s Actually “Right”?
This depends on who’s more likely to be wrong.
Ask yourself:
Have you flipped similar homes in similar areas before?
Have your past projects met or beat your own estimates?
Do you have repeat vendors, GCs, and buyers in your ecosystem?
If yes, you may have more accurate numbers than your lender.
But if you:
Are new to the market
Are you using a new contractor
Haven’t flipped this property type before
Are you guessing on rehab or resale pricing
Then your lender’s caution may be justified.
A Smart Flipper’s Play: Use Their Numbers as a Stress Test
Instead of arguing, use your lender’s model as a second opinion:
Plug their ARV into your MAO calculator
Use their rehab estimate in a worst-case scenario model
Run their timeline through your holding cost calculator
Ask:
Does the deal still make money with their inputs?
Would you still close it, or does it only work with perfect numbers?
If it only works when everything goes right, their version may save you from a loss.
Bulletproof Your Own Numbers Before You Present a Deal
Make sure you have:
At least 3 solid comps within 0.5 miles, same bed/bath count, similar finish
An itemized rehab scope based on a walkthrough or detailed photos
A realistic timeline based on contractor availability and permit timelines
A resale strategy with multiple buyer types (retail, landlord, flipper)
A minimum profit spread based on your standards, not just theirs
If your numbers are strong and backed with documentation, you’ll close more deals and get better rates, regardless of initial friction.
You’re Both Right, In Different Ways
Your lender isn’t in the flipping business. They’re in the repayment business.
So yes, they’re going to be more conservative. But that doesn’t mean your numbers are wrong.
It just means you should:
Understand where the gaps are coming from
Learn how to present data that closes those gaps
Know when it’s time to push… and when it’s time to pass
Because the smartest flippers don’t just trust their numbers blindly. They test them against reality and other people’s money.
Written By:

Austin Beveridge
Chief Operating Officer
Ready to connect with homeowners ready to list?
Define your target area, and we'll connect you with home sellers ready to list. No cold calls, no guesswork. Just show up to the appointment, and sign the listing agreement. Pay only when the deal closes.
*You will be subscribe to our newsletter
